Diaspora of Bhuta (Daiva) worshipping cult—India and Indonesia

by Shilpa V. Sonawane | 2019 | 34,738 words

This study researches the Bhuta (Daiva) worshipping cult in India and Indonesia.—This Essay is carried out at a multidisciplinary level, through the religious, geographical, historical, mythological, cultural and anthropological analogy between two states, India and the Indonesian archipelago, and its rich culture and religion, together with the pr...

Part 14 - Contact To South India:

The defenders of Kumari Kandam on Kanniyakumari insisted that the aforementioned city was part of Kandari Kumari. Many Tamil Nadu scientists and their entire, entire geographical area of the Indian Peninsula (South Windhas), made emotional arguments, and even India was all part of Kumari Kandam. The above has helped ensure Tamil today both the inhabitants of southern India and the descendants of Kumari Kandam residents, allowing them to tell the tone and civilization of Tamil as the oldest and oldest in the world.[1]

In the British colonial era, Kanyakumari was then part of the state of Transfancuri (which merged with the newly formed state after the reorganization of 1965). Tamil politicians focused their findings to ensure that Kanniyakumari could be included in the Tamildominated Madras state (now Tamil Nadu). The above can be considered significant because of Kanyakumari's physical relationship with Kumari and Kandam.[2]

The people of Tolo Nadu follow a bicentennial history of cult including the worship of the Protestant gods as well as local spirits. The Puranic deities are worshiped in temples under the clergy of Brahman leadership and faithful are merely listeners (observers) receiving donations, and as such, should not be approached directly.[3] On the other hand, spirits are local and personal gods that share a more intimate relationship with worshipers. Spirits have fixed-impact logos and are usually associated with a family, village or area, and the believers provide regular contributions. In contrast, spirits protect villagers and their livestock from danger and warn them when needed.[4]

Footnotes and references:

[1]:

Kalittokai 104:1–4

[2]:

Purananuru 6:1–2, 17:1, 67:6.

[3]:

Shulman 1980, pp. 57-69.

[4]:

Shulman 1980, p. 57.

Like what you read? Consider supporting this website: